Funcionalismo penal moderado o teleológico-valorativo versus funcionalismo normativo o radical
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/9977
Title: | Funcionalismo penal moderado o teleológico-valorativo versus funcionalismo normativo o radical |
---|---|
Other Titles: | Moderate or theological-evaluating criminal functionalism versus normative or radical functionalism |
Authors: | Arias Eibe, Manuel José |
Keywords: | Funcionalismo | Roxin, Claus | Política criminal | Jakobs, Günther | Luhmann, Niklas | Prevención general | Functionalism | Criminal policy | General prevention |
Knowledge Area: | Filosofía del Derecho |
Issue Date: | 2006 |
Publisher: | Universidad de Alicante. Área de Filosofía del Derecho |
Citation: | ARIAS EIBE, Manuel José. “Funcionalismo penal moderado o teleológico-valorativo versus funcionalismo normativo o radical”. Doxa. N. 29 (2006). ISSN 0214-8876, pp. 439-453 |
Abstract: | Dentro del pensamiento del funcionalismo penal alemán —al margen de otras orientaciones menos relevantes— destacan el funcionalismo moderado de C. ROXIN y el funcionalismo radical de G. JAKOBS. Tanto el sistema de ROXIN, como el sistema de JAKOBS, se orientan a la realización de determinados valores que se constituyen en rectores del sistema mismo, pero esos valores son diferentes en uno y otro dogmático. Mientras que para ROXIN los valores provienen de la política criminal propia de un Estado social y democrático de Derecho —superando de ese modo el relativismo valorativo en que habían caído los neokantianos—, en JAKOBS los valores se pretenden transponer desde la teoría sociológica de LUHMANN. | Regarding the theories of the German criminal functionalism —and excluding less relevant considerations—, we can distinguish between the moderate functionalism of C. ROXIN and the radical functionalism of G. JAKOBS. The objective of both systems is the attainment of certain values which govern the system itself, but such values are considered in a different way by both theorists. According to ROXIN those values arise from the criminal policy characteristic of a social and democratic state ruled by law, or constitutional state —so transcending the valorative relativism previously sustained by neokantians—, whereas for JAKOBS, those values are transposed departing from the sociological theory of LUHMANN. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/9977 | http://dx.doi.org/10.14198/DOXA2006.29.24 |
ISSN: | 0214-8876 |
DOI: | 10.14198/DOXA2006.29.24 |
Language: | spa |
Type: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Peer Review: | si |
Appears in Collections: | DOXA - 2006, N. 29 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Doxa_29_24.pdf | 141,97 kB | Adobe PDF | Open Preview | |
Items in RUA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.