Sweat responses during inactive recovery after high-intensity running in hot, dry and humid conditions

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/91089
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Sweat responses during inactive recovery after high-intensity running in hot, dry and humid conditions
Autor/es: Høye, Erik | Sandsund, Mariann | Reinertsen, Randi Eidsmo
Palabras clave: Heat | Relative humidity | Exercise | Recovery | Technical absorbents
Área/s de conocimiento: Educación Física y Deportiva
Fecha de publicación: 2019
Editor: Universidad de Alicante. Área de Educación Física y Deporte
Cita bibliográfica: Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2020, 15(1): 137-152. doi:10.14198/jhse.2020.151.13
Resumen: This study investigated the relationship between high (85%) and low (19%) relative humidity (RH) and sweat rate during inactive recovery after high-intensity work in a hot environment (30 °C). Ten male subjects performed two 20-minute run trials at 68 ± 4 % of maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) followed by 36 minutes of inactive recovery in standing position. Regional sweat rate (RSR) was measured on the forearm and mid-central back by technical absorbent pads, and gross sweat loss was estimated from change in body weight. Core temperature (Tc) and six skin temperatures for calculation of mean skin temperature (Ts) were measured continuously together with heart rate (HR) during running and recovery. Results show that RSR was significantly (p<0.05) higher for both arm and back during running and inactive recovery in 85% RH compared to 19% RH. The highest sweat rate was observed on the back during the last five minutes of running in 85% RH (1387 g·m-2·h-1) compared to 19% RH (886 g·m-2·h-1). Gross sweat loss (GSL) was significantly higher in 85% RH (796 ± 414 g·h-1) than 19% RH (489 ± 140 g·h-1) conditions (p=0.010). Tc continued to increase for three and seven minutes post-exercise in 19% RH and 85% RH, respectively and Ts was significantly higher in 85% RH than in 19% RH (p<0.05). HR was 11 bpm higher after running in 85% RH compared to 19% RH (p=0.001). In conclusion, RSR and GSL, as well as HR, Tc and Ts was higher during post-exercise recovery in 30°C and 85% RH than in 30°C and 19% RH. This study emphasises the importance of including the effect of relative humidity in assessment of both exercise and recovery.
Patrocinador/es: The study was funded by the Research Council of Norway (grant no. 227107/H20).
URI: https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2020.151.13 | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/91089
ISSN: 1988-5202
DOI: 10.14198/jhse.2020.151.13
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: Licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://www.jhse.ua.es/
Aparece en las colecciones:Journal of Human Sport and Exercise - 2020, Vol. 15, No. 1

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailJHSE_15-1_13.pdf524,1 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons