Sweat responses during inactive recovery after high-intensity running in hot, dry and humid conditions

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/91089
Registro completo de metadatos
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorHøye, Erik-
dc.contributor.authorSandsund, Mariann-
dc.contributor.authorReinertsen, Randi Eidsmo-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-11T07:51:03Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-11T07:51:03Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2020, 15(1): 137-152. doi:10.14198/jhse.2020.151.13es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1988-5202-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2020.151.13-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10045/91089-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated the relationship between high (85%) and low (19%) relative humidity (RH) and sweat rate during inactive recovery after high-intensity work in a hot environment (30 °C). Ten male subjects performed two 20-minute run trials at 68 ± 4 % of maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) followed by 36 minutes of inactive recovery in standing position. Regional sweat rate (RSR) was measured on the forearm and mid-central back by technical absorbent pads, and gross sweat loss was estimated from change in body weight. Core temperature (Tc) and six skin temperatures for calculation of mean skin temperature (Ts) were measured continuously together with heart rate (HR) during running and recovery. Results show that RSR was significantly (p<0.05) higher for both arm and back during running and inactive recovery in 85% RH compared to 19% RH. The highest sweat rate was observed on the back during the last five minutes of running in 85% RH (1387 g·m-2·h-1) compared to 19% RH (886 g·m-2·h-1). Gross sweat loss (GSL) was significantly higher in 85% RH (796 ± 414 g·h-1) than 19% RH (489 ± 140 g·h-1) conditions (p=0.010). Tc continued to increase for three and seven minutes post-exercise in 19% RH and 85% RH, respectively and Ts was significantly higher in 85% RH than in 19% RH (p<0.05). HR was 11 bpm higher after running in 85% RH compared to 19% RH (p=0.001). In conclusion, RSR and GSL, as well as HR, Tc and Ts was higher during post-exercise recovery in 30°C and 85% RH than in 30°C and 19% RH. This study emphasises the importance of including the effect of relative humidity in assessment of both exercise and recovery.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was funded by the Research Council of Norway (grant no. 227107/H20).es_ES
dc.languageenges_ES
dc.publisherUniversidad de Alicante. Área de Educación Física y Deportees_ES
dc.rightsLicencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0es_ES
dc.subjectHeates_ES
dc.subjectRelative humidityes_ES
dc.subjectExercisees_ES
dc.subjectRecoveryes_ES
dc.subjectTechnical absorbentses_ES
dc.subject.otherEducación Física y Deportivaes_ES
dc.titleSweat responses during inactive recovery after high-intensity running in hot, dry and humid conditionses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.peerreviewedsies_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.14198/jhse.2020.151.13-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.jhse.ua.es/es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:Journal of Human Sport and Exercise - 2020, Vol. 15, No. 1

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailJHSE_15-1_13.pdf524,1 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons