Effect of Different Feedback Modalities on Swimming Pace: Which Feedback Modality is Most Effective?
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/87248
Título: | Effect of Different Feedback Modalities on Swimming Pace: Which Feedback Modality is Most Effective? |
---|---|
Autor/es: | Altavilla, Cesare | Cejuela, Roberto | Caballero, Pablo |
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: | Research in Physical Education, Fitness and Performance (RIPEFAP) | Análisis de Alimentos y Nutrición | Grupo Balmis de Investigación en Salud Comunitaria e Historia de la Ciencia |
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Didáctica General y Didácticas Específicas | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia |
Palabras clave: | Training | Performance | Auditory pathways | Sensory | Split time |
Área/s de conocimiento: | Educación Física y Deportiva | Enfermería |
Fecha de publicación: | 31-dic-2018 |
Editor: | De Gruyter |
Cita bibliográfica: | Journal of Human Kinetics. 2018, 65: 187-195. doi:10.2478/hukin-2018-0026 |
Resumen: | To compare the effect of three different feedback modalities on swimming pace, sixteen male swimmers and triathletes participated in this study. Each participant swam 3 x 400 m, one for each feedback modality, swimming front crawl at 80% of their individual swimming critical speed. Three feedback modalities were examined: self-pacing, real time visual feedback and real time voice feedback. The swimmers adopted a fast start in all feedback modalities. In the real time voice feedback modality, the data recorded during the second lap (200 m) showed a significant improvement of their swimming pace approaching the swimming pace intended (-1.47 s, p < .01, medium effect size 0.79). A significant improvement toward the swimming pace intended was also noticed at the third split time (300 m) (0.05 s, p < .01, large effect size 0.81) and at the fourth split time (400 m) (0.46 s, p < .01, medium effect size 0.76). In self-pacing, the swimmers were not able to swim in line with the swimming pace intended. In real time visual feedback modality, the swimmers did not show a significant improvement approaching the swimming pace intended. The results revealed that communication with the swimmers using the real time voice feedback induced a significant improvement in their swimming pace and could help the athletes to swim with accurate and consistent pace. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/87248 |
ISSN: | 1640-5544 (Print) | 1899-7562 (Online) |
DOI: | 10.2478/hukin-2018-0026 |
Idioma: | eng |
Tipo: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Derechos: | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license |
Revisión científica: | si |
Versión del editor: | https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2018-0026 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | INV - SCAPE - Artículos de Revistas INV - AAQCN - Artículos de Revistas INV - SALUD - Artículos de Revistas |
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018_Altavilla_etal_JHumanKinetics.pdf | 308,13 kB | Adobe PDF | Abrir Vista previa | |
Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons