Comparison of a textual versus a graphical notation for the maintainability of MDE domain models: an empirical pilot study
Empreu sempre aquest identificador per citar o enllaçar aquest ítem
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/61730
Títol: | Comparison of a textual versus a graphical notation for the maintainability of MDE domain models: an empirical pilot study |
---|---|
Autors: | Meliá, Santiago | Cachero, Cristina | Hermida Carbonell, Jesús María | Aparicio Castellanos, Enrique |
Grups d'investigació o GITE: | Advanced deveLopment and empIrical research on Software (ALISoft) |
Centre, Departament o Servei: | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos |
Paraules clau: | MDE | Maintainability | Analysability | Modifiability | Quasi-experiment | Notations |
Àrees de coneixement: | Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos |
Data de publicació: | de setembre-2016 |
Editor: | Springer Science+Business Media New York |
Citació bibliogràfica: | Software Quality Journal. 2016, 24(3): 709-735. doi:10.1007/s11219-015-9299-x |
Resum: | Models are a useful tool to increase the developer’s productivity and satisfaction when performing maintenance tasks. However, in order to maximise these advantages, the right selection of notations must be made. Unfortunately, the software engineering field lacks a body of empirical evidence that supports such selection. A suboptimal decision in this regard may have negative consequences over the maintenance process. The aim of the study was to compare a textual and a graphical notation with respect to the efficiency, effectiveness and satisfaction of junior software developers while performing analysability and modifiability tasks on two different applications. We have carried out a quasi-experiment with 86 third-year students of the Computer Engineering degree at the University of Alicante. Subjects were randomly classified into two groups, and each group performed 20 maintenance tasks with a textual and a graphical notation. We measured and compared the efficiency, effectiveness and satisfaction of subjects assigned to each treatment. The analysed data show that only the actual analysability coverage (AACov) and the actual modifiability efficiency (AMEffc) are affected by the type of notation used, regardless of the application. In both cases, subjects using the textual notation performed significantly better, although the effect size was low to moderate (AACov η2=0.106, AMEffc η2=0.187). This is a pilot study, and it has been conducted to enhance the design of future studies in this area. Thus, it should be replicated to extend our conclusions to other subject profiles, different textual and graphical notations, and application types. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/61730 |
ISSN: | 0963-9314 (Print) | 1573-1367 (Online) |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11219-015-9299-x |
Idioma: | eng |
Tipus: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Drets: | © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11219-015-9299-x |
Revisió científica: | si |
Versió de l'editor: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11219-015-9299-x |
Apareix a la col·lecció: | INV - ALISoft - Artículos de Revistas |
Arxius per aquest ítem:
Arxiu | Descripció | Tamany | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016_Melia_etal_SoftwareQualJ_preprint.pdf | Preprint (acceso abierto) | 482,72 kB | Adobe PDF | Obrir Vista prèvia |
2016_Melia_etal_SoftwareQualJ_final.pdf | Versión final (acceso restringido) | 1,08 MB | Adobe PDF | Obrir Sol·licitar una còpia |
Tots els documents dipositats a RUA estan protegits per drets d'autors. Alguns drets reservats.