The importance of study design strategies in gender bias research: the case of respiratory disease management in primary care
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/4286
Título: | The importance of study design strategies in gender bias research: the case of respiratory disease management in primary care |
---|---|
Autor/es: | Ruiz-Cantero, María Teresa | Ronda-Pérez, Elena | Álvarez-Dardet, Carlos |
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: | Salud Pública |
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia |
Palabras clave: | Gender | Bias | Health | Disease |
Área/s de conocimiento: | Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública |
Fecha de creación: | 2007 |
Fecha de publicación: | dic-2007 |
Editor: | BMJ Publishing Group |
Cita bibliográfica: | RUIZ CANTERO, María Teresa; RONDA PÉREZ, Elena; ÁLVAREZ-DARDET DÍAZ, Carlos. "The importance of study design strategies in gender bias research: the case of respiratory disease management in primary care". Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. Vol. 61, Supplement 2 (Dec. 2007). ISSN 0143-005X, pp. ii11-ii16 |
Resumen: | Background: Most research on gender bias has been carried out in hospitals and focuses mainly on severe diseases. Consequently, little is known about gender bias in relation to other illnesses and healthcare settings. Aim: To explore the existence of gender bias in the management of patients seeking primary care for respiratory complaints. Method: An observational, prospective blind follow-up study was performed in a primary care centre in Alicante, Spain. 830 patients were monitored from first visit to their general practitioner with a respiratory complaint until final diagnosis. Information was obtained about the diagnostic process (anamnesis, clinical examination and diagnostic tests) and therapeutic procedures (concession of unfit to work status and the patient’s destination following the visit). Logistic regression was used to compare the diagnostic/therapeutic procedures in men and women. Results: Although men (318) and women (512) had similar respiratory complaints, after adjustment by age, marital status, employment, education, comorbidity and severity, men were more likely to be asked about smoking habits: RRa: 2.41 (95% CI: 1.57 to 3.70), auscultated: RRa: 1.30 (0.90 to 1.75), provided with a defined diagnosis: RRa: 1.77 (0.98 to 3.32) and considered unfit to work: RRa: 5.43 (1.64 to 9.96). Women were more likely to receive a pharyngotonsillar exploration: RRa: 0.63 (0.41 to 0.97). Conclusions: Despite having the same respiratory symptoms, women were less likely to undergo diagnostic procedures and doctors tended to classify women in the category of undefined diagnosis more often. It should be considered that gender bias in the diagnosis could contribute to an erroneous estimation of respiratory disease prevalence, which could lead to unequal management of one sex related to the other. |
Patrocinador/es: | This study was partially funded by a grant from the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (95/0688) (Health Research Fund) and the Instituto Valenciano de Estudios e Investigación (Valencian Institute for Study and Research). |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/4286 |
ISSN: | 0143-005X |
DOI: | 10.1136/jech.2007.060301 |
Idioma: | eng |
Tipo: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Derechos: | Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. http://jech.bmj.com/ |
Revisión científica: | si |
Versión del editor: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2007.060301 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | INV - SP - Artículos de Revistas Institucional - IUIEG - Publicaciones |
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The_importance_of_study_design.pdf | 159 kB | Adobe PDF | Abrir Vista previa | |
Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.