Stryd biomechanical parameters as indicators of running economy and performance

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/140885
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Stryd biomechanical parameters as indicators of running economy and performance
Autor/es: Jaén-Carrillo, Diego | Ruiz-Alias, Santiago A. | Olaya-Cuartero, Javier | García-Pinillos, Felipe
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Salud, Actividad Física y Tecnología Deportiva (HEALTH-TECH)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Didáctica General y Didácticas Específicas
Palabras clave: Energy cost | Ground contact time | IMU | Power | Racing | Running biomechanics | Stryd Power Meter | Training
Fecha de publicación: 7-feb-2024
Editor: SAGE Publications | Institution of Mechanical Engineers
Cita bibliográfica: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371231220760
Resumen: The interplay of biomechanical and neuromuscular aspects aids in the conversion of power production in running performance, and when combined with metabolic factors, these aspects may lead to improved running economy (RE). Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the association between the Stryd Power Meter foot pod metrics with RE and performance. Fifteen high-caliber male athletes completed two treadmill running sessions. First, RE was determined at 10 and 12 km/h. Second, two all-out efforts of nine and three minute duration were completed. At 10 km/h, the simple and stepwise multiple linear regression analysis revealed that form power (FP) was the best RE predictor (adjusted R2 = 0.464; p = 0.005) followed by vertical oscillation (VO) (R2 = 0.424; p = 0.005) and ground contact time (GCT) (R2 = 0.363; p = 0.010). At 12 km/h, such regressions confirmed that GCT was the best RE indicator (adjusted R2 = 0.222; p = 0.043) followed by FP (adjusted R2 = 0.213; p = 0.047). During the nine and three minute all-out effort sessions, GCT was the best performance predictor (R2 = 0.491; p = 0.002 and R2 = 0.380; p = 0.014, respectively). The biomechanical factors of GCT and FP are good indicators of RE and running performance.
Patrocinador/es: Financial support was received by the MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 under the EDUSport Research Project (ref. PID2020-115600RB-C21). In addition, Santiago A. Ruiz-Alias received financial support by the Spanish Ministry of Education under grant [FPU19/00542].
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/140885
ISSN: 1754-3371 (Print) | 1754-338X (Online)
DOI: 10.1177/17543371231220760
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © IMechE 2024
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371231220760
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - HEALTH-TECH - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailJaen-Carrillo_etal_2024_ProcIMechEPartP_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)600,49 kBAdobe PDFAbrir    Solicitar una copia


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.