Stryd biomechanical parameters as indicators of running economy and performance

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/140885
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Title: Stryd biomechanical parameters as indicators of running economy and performance
Authors: Jaén-Carrillo, Diego | Ruiz-Alias, Santiago A. | Olaya-Cuartero, Javier | García-Pinillos, Felipe
Research Group/s: Salud, Actividad Física y Tecnología Deportiva (HEALTH-TECH)
Center, Department or Service: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Didáctica General y Didácticas Específicas
Keywords: Energy cost | Ground contact time | IMU | Power | Racing | Running biomechanics | Stryd Power Meter | Training
Issue Date: 7-Feb-2024
Publisher: SAGE Publications | Institution of Mechanical Engineers
Citation: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371231220760
Abstract: The interplay of biomechanical and neuromuscular aspects aids in the conversion of power production in running performance, and when combined with metabolic factors, these aspects may lead to improved running economy (RE). Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the association between the Stryd Power Meter foot pod metrics with RE and performance. Fifteen high-caliber male athletes completed two treadmill running sessions. First, RE was determined at 10 and 12 km/h. Second, two all-out efforts of nine and three minute duration were completed. At 10 km/h, the simple and stepwise multiple linear regression analysis revealed that form power (FP) was the best RE predictor (adjusted R2 = 0.464; p = 0.005) followed by vertical oscillation (VO) (R2 = 0.424; p = 0.005) and ground contact time (GCT) (R2 = 0.363; p = 0.010). At 12 km/h, such regressions confirmed that GCT was the best RE indicator (adjusted R2 = 0.222; p = 0.043) followed by FP (adjusted R2 = 0.213; p = 0.047). During the nine and three minute all-out effort sessions, GCT was the best performance predictor (R2 = 0.491; p = 0.002 and R2 = 0.380; p = 0.014, respectively). The biomechanical factors of GCT and FP are good indicators of RE and running performance.
Sponsor: Financial support was received by the MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 under the EDUSport Research Project (ref. PID2020-115600RB-C21). In addition, Santiago A. Ruiz-Alias received financial support by the Spanish Ministry of Education under grant [FPU19/00542].
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/140885
ISSN: 1754-3371 (Print) | 1754-338X (Online)
DOI: 10.1177/17543371231220760
Language: eng
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights: © IMechE 2024
Peer Review: si
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371231220760
Appears in Collections:INV - HEALTH-TECH - Artículos de Revistas

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ThumbnailJaen-Carrillo_etal_2024_ProcIMechEPartP_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)600,49 kBAdobe PDFOpen    Request a copy


Items in RUA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.