Stryd biomechanical parameters as indicators of running economy and performance
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/140885
Title: | Stryd biomechanical parameters as indicators of running economy and performance |
---|---|
Authors: | Jaén-Carrillo, Diego | Ruiz-Alias, Santiago A. | Olaya-Cuartero, Javier | García-Pinillos, Felipe |
Research Group/s: | Salud, Actividad Física y Tecnología Deportiva (HEALTH-TECH) |
Center, Department or Service: | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Didáctica General y Didácticas Específicas |
Keywords: | Energy cost | Ground contact time | IMU | Power | Racing | Running biomechanics | Stryd Power Meter | Training |
Issue Date: | 7-Feb-2024 |
Publisher: | SAGE Publications | Institution of Mechanical Engineers |
Citation: | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371231220760 |
Abstract: | The interplay of biomechanical and neuromuscular aspects aids in the conversion of power production in running performance, and when combined with metabolic factors, these aspects may lead to improved running economy (RE). Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the association between the Stryd Power Meter foot pod metrics with RE and performance. Fifteen high-caliber male athletes completed two treadmill running sessions. First, RE was determined at 10 and 12 km/h. Second, two all-out efforts of nine and three minute duration were completed. At 10 km/h, the simple and stepwise multiple linear regression analysis revealed that form power (FP) was the best RE predictor (adjusted R2 = 0.464; p = 0.005) followed by vertical oscillation (VO) (R2 = 0.424; p = 0.005) and ground contact time (GCT) (R2 = 0.363; p = 0.010). At 12 km/h, such regressions confirmed that GCT was the best RE indicator (adjusted R2 = 0.222; p = 0.043) followed by FP (adjusted R2 = 0.213; p = 0.047). During the nine and three minute all-out effort sessions, GCT was the best performance predictor (R2 = 0.491; p = 0.002 and R2 = 0.380; p = 0.014, respectively). The biomechanical factors of GCT and FP are good indicators of RE and running performance. |
Sponsor: | Financial support was received by the MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 under the EDUSport Research Project (ref. PID2020-115600RB-C21). In addition, Santiago A. Ruiz-Alias received financial support by the Spanish Ministry of Education under grant [FPU19/00542]. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/140885 |
ISSN: | 1754-3371 (Print) | 1754-338X (Online) |
DOI: | 10.1177/17543371231220760 |
Language: | eng |
Type: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Rights: | © IMechE 2024 |
Peer Review: | si |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371231220760 |
Appears in Collections: | INV - HEALTH-TECH - Artículos de Revistas |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Jaen-Carrillo_etal_2024_ProcIMechEPartP_final.pdf | Versión final (acceso restringido) | 600,49 kB | Adobe PDF | Open Request a copy |
Items in RUA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.