Activities of Daily Living and Environment Recognition Using Mobile Devices: A Comparative Study

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/101749
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Activities of Daily Living and Environment Recognition Using Mobile Devices: A Comparative Study
Autor/es: Ferreira, José M. | Pires, Ivan Miguel | Marques, Gonçalo | García, Nuno M. | Zdravevski, Eftim | Lameski, Petre | Flórez-Revuelta, Francisco | Spinsante, Susanna | Xu, Lina
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Informática Industrial y Redes de Computadores
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Tecnología Informática y Computación
Palabras clave: Activities of daily living | AdaBoost | Mobile devices | Artificial neural networks | Deep neural networks
Área/s de conocimiento: Arquitectura y Tecnología de Computadores
Fecha de publicación: 18-ene-2020
Editor: MDPI
Cita bibliográfica: Ferreira JM, Pires IM, Marques G, García NM, Zdravevski E, Lameski P, Flórez-Revuelta F, Spinsante S, Xu L. Activities of Daily Living and Environment Recognition Using Mobile Devices: A Comparative Study. Electronics. 2020; 9(1):180. doi:10.3390/electronics9010180
Resumen: The recognition of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) using the sensors available in off-the-shelf mobile devices with high accuracy is significant for the development of their framework. Previously, a framework that comprehends data acquisition, data processing, data cleaning, feature extraction, data fusion, and data classification was proposed. However, the results may be improved with the implementation of other methods. Similar to the initial proposal of the framework, this paper proposes the recognition of eight ADL, e.g., walking, running, standing, going upstairs, going downstairs, driving, sleeping, and watching television, and nine environments, e.g., bar, hall, kitchen, library, street, bedroom, living room, gym, and classroom, but using the Instance Based k-nearest neighbour (IBk) and AdaBoost methods as well. The primary purpose of this paper is to find the best machine learning method for ADL and environment recognition. The results obtained show that IBk and AdaBoost reported better results, with complex data than the deep neural network methods.
Patrocinador/es: This work is funded by FCT/MCTES through national funds and when applicable co-funded EU funds under the project UIDB/EEA/50008/2020 (Este trabalho é financiado pela FCT/MCTES através de fundos nacionais e quando aplicável cofinanciado por fundos comunitários no âmbito do projeto UIDB/EEA/50008/2020). This article is based on work from COST Action IC1303 - AAPELE - Architectures, Algorithms and Protocols for Enhanced Living Environments, and COST Action CA16226 - SHELD-ON- Indoor living space improvement: Smart Habitat for the Elderly, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). More information at www.cost.eu.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/101749
ISSN: 2079-9292
DOI: 10.3390/electronics9010180
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9010180
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - I2RC - Artículos de Revistas
INV - AmI4AHA - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Thumbnail2020_Ferreira_etal_Electronics_9-180.pdf255,36 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons