How come scientists uncritically adopt and embody Thomson’s bibliographic impact factor?
Empreu sempre aquest identificador per citar o enllaçar aquest ítem
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/9602
Registre complet
| Camp Dublin Core | Valor | Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Salud Pública | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Porta Serra, Miquel | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Álvarez-Dardet, Carlos | - |
| dc.contributor.other | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia | en |
| dc.contributor.other | Instituto Municipal de Investigación Médica (IMIM-Hospital del Mar) | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-02-12T09:31:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-02-12T09:31:49Z | - |
| dc.date.created | 2007 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2008-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | PORTA SERRA, Miquel; ÁLVAREZ-DARDET DÍAZ, Carlos. "How come scientists uncritically adopt and embody Thomson’s bibliographic impact factor?". Epidemiology. Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2008). ISSN 1044-3983, pp. 370-371 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1044-3983 (Print) | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1531-5487 (Online) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/9602 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The bibliographic impact factor (BIF) of Thomson Scientific is sometimes not a valid scientometric indicator for a number of reasons. One major reason is the strong influence of the number of “source items” or “articles” for each journal that the company chooses each year as BIF’s denominator. The irresistible fascination with (and picturesque uses of) a construct as scientifically weak as BIF are simple reminders that scientists are embedded in and embody culture. | en |
| dc.language | eng | en |
| dc.publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins | en |
| dc.rights | The definitive version is available at www.epidem.com | en |
| dc.subject | Bibliographic impact factor | en |
| dc.subject | Indicator | en |
| dc.subject | Construct | en |
| dc.subject.other | Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública | en |
| dc.title | How come scientists uncritically adopt and embody Thomson’s bibliographic impact factor? | en |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | en |
| dc.peerreviewed | si | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31816b73ab | - |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e31816b73ab | - |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | - |
| Apareix a la col·lecció: | INV - SP - Artículos de Revistas Institucional - IUIEG - Publicaciones | |
Arxius per aquest ítem:
| Arxiu | Descripció | Tamany | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 how_scientists_adopt_impact_factor.pdf | Versión final (acceso restringido) | 94,16 kB | Adobe PDF | Obrir Sol·licitar una còpia |
Veure citacions a Google Académic
Tots els documents dipositats a RUA estan protegits per drets d'autors. Alguns drets reservats.