Predictors of Successful Outcome following Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments Implantation

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/93848
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Title: Predictors of Successful Outcome following Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments Implantation
Authors: Sedaghat, Mohammad-Reza | Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed | Piñero, David P. | Akbarzadeh, Reyhaneh | Moshirfar, Majid | Bamdad, Shahram | Gazanchian, Mehrdad
Research Group/s: Grupo de Óptica y Percepción Visual (GOPV)
Center, Department or Service: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Óptica, Farmacología y Anatomía
Keywords: Keratoconus | Intrastromal corneal ring segments | Keraring | Corneal topography | Corneal biomechanics
Knowledge Area: Óptica
Issue Date: 2-Apr-2019
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Citation: Current Eye Research. 2019, 44(7): 707-715. doi:10.1080/02713683.2019.1594945
Abstract: Purpose: To assess the preoperative visual, refractive, corneal topo/tomographic, aberrometric and biomechanical parameters as predictive factors of a successful outcome 6 months following intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation. Methods: Sixty-eight keratoconus eyes implanted with Keraring using femtosecond laser technology were assessed. The preoperative assessed parameters included uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA & CDVA), refraction, placido-disk based topography using TMS-4, Scheimplfug tomography using Pentacam HR, corneal biomechanical assessments using Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and the wavefront analysis using i-Trace aberrometer. Other variables were type of astigmatism based on orientation of the steep meridian, keratoconus staging based on the Amsler–Krumeich classification and the difference between the axes of refractive astigmatism, topographic astigmatism and comatic aberration based on a difference less or more than 30°. The success criterion was defined based on CDVA, a post-operative CDVA improvement at least two lines were considered as a success and otherwise were recognized as a failure following Keraring implantation. Results: Only UDVA, coincidence of the most elevated points on the front and back corneal surfaces and the difference between UDVA and CDVA showed significant difference between the eyes with successful outcomes and those with unsuccessful results (P < 0.05). Although corneal curvature and astigmatism were higher and corneal thickness was lower in the unsuccessful group, differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: It is expected that the greater difference between the preoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (Δ UDVA–CDVA) and more coincidence of the most elevated points in the two corneal surfaces on the elevation maps increase the rate of successful outcome following the Keraring implantation.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/93848
ISSN: 0271-3683 (Print) | 1460-2202 (Online)
DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1594945
Language: eng
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights: © 2019 Informa UK Limited
Peer Review: si
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2019.1594945
Appears in Collections:INV - GOPV - Artículos de Revistas

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Thumbnail2019_Sedaghat_etal_CurrEyeRes_accepted.pdfAccepted Manuscript (acceso abierto)967,15 kBAdobe PDFOpen Preview


Items in RUA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.