Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/73738
Registro completo de metadatos
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributorGrupo de Óptica y Percepción Visual (GOPV)es_ES
dc.contributor.authorCamps, Vicente J.-
dc.contributor.authorPiñero, David P.-
dc.contributor.authorCaravaca Arens, Esteban-
dc.contributor.authorFez Saiz, Dolores de-
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Alicante. Departamento de Óptica, Farmacología y Anatomíaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-22T15:02:35Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-22T15:02:35Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-
dc.identifier.citationIndian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2017, 65(8): 690-699. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_274_16es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0301-4738 (Print)-
dc.identifier.issn1998-3689 (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10045/73738-
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to evaluate the theoretical influence on intraocular lens power (PIOL) calculation of the use of keratometric approach for corneal power (Pc) calculation in keratoconus and to develop and validate an algorithm preliminarily to minimize this influence. Methods: Pcwas calculated theoretically with the classical keratometric approach, the Gaussian equation, and the keratometric approach using a variable keratometric index (nkadj) dependent on r1c(Pkadj). Differences in PIOL calculations (ΔPIOL) using keratometric and Gaussian Pcvalues were evaluated. Preliminary clinical validation of a PIOLalgorithm using Pkadj was performed in 13 keratoconus eyes. Results: PIOL underestimation was present if Pc was overestimated, and vice versa. Theoretical PIOLoverestimation up to −5.6 D and −6.2 D using Le Grand and Gullstrand eye models was found for a keratometric index of 1.3375. If nkadjwas used, maximal Δ PIOL was ±1.1 D, with most of the values ≤±0.6 D. Clinically, PIOLunder- and over-estimations ranged from −1.1 to − 0.4 D. No statistically significant differences were found between PIOL obtained with Pkadjand Gaussian equation (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The use of the keratometric Pcfor PIOL calculations in keratoconus can lead to significant errors that may be minimized using a Pkadj approach.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research leading to these results has received funding from the Generalitat Valenciana (Valencian Community, Spain) under the grant for emergent research groups with reference GV2014/086.es_ES
dc.languageenges_ES
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer - Medknowes_ES
dc.rights© 2017 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‑NonCommercial‑ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non‑commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.es_ES
dc.subjectCataract surgeryes_ES
dc.subjectIntraocular lens poweres_ES
dc.subjectKeratoconuses_ES
dc.subjectKeratometric indexes_ES
dc.subjectKeratometryes_ES
dc.subject.otherÓpticaes_ES
dc.titlePreliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconuses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.peerreviewedsies_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/ijo.IJO_274_16-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_274_16es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - GOPV - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Thumbnail2017_Camps_etal_IndianJOphthalmol.pdf833,61 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons