Assessment of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Reproducibility of Micro-Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Distal Ureteral Stones in Women: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/66094
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Assessment of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Reproducibility of Micro-Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Distal Ureteral Stones in Women: A Multicenter Prospective Study
Autor/es: Caballero-Romeu, Juan-Pablo | Galán-Llopis, Juan-Antonio | Pérez-Fentes, Daniel | Budia-Alba, Alberto | Cepeda-Delgado, Marcos | Palmero-Marti, Jose-Luis | Cansino-Alcaide, Jose-Ramón | Caballero, Pablo | Ibarluzea-Gonzalez, Gaspar
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Grupo Balmis de Investigación en Salud Comunitaria e Historia de la Ciencia
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia
Palabras clave: Miniaturization | Minimally invasive surgical procedures | Reproducibility of results | Ureteroscopy | Urinary calculi
Área/s de conocimiento: Enfermería
Fecha de publicación: 1-nov-2016
Editor: Mary Ann Liebert
Cita bibliográfica: Journal of Endourology. 2016, 30(11): 1185-1193. doi:10.1089/end.2016.0503
Resumen: Purpose: The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness, safety, and reproducibility of the micro-ureteroscopy (m-URS) in the treatment of distal ureteral stones in women. Materials and Methods: A multicenter, prospective observational study was designed and conducted between March and December 2015. We included women having at least one stone in the distal ureter and being a candidate for surgical treatment using the 4.85F sheath of MicroPerc®. Patients with clinical criteria and/or laboratory analysis indicating sepsis or coagulation alteration were excluded. Results: Thirty-nine women were operated in eight hospitals. The profile of the patients was fairly homogeneous among hospitals. Only differences were found in age, preoperative stent, and the result of the previous urine culture. Immediate stone-free status was achieved in 88.2% and 100% 7 days after the procedure. 97.4% of patients did not present any complication in the postoperative period, with only one case with complication Clavien II. Postureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS) in 76.9% of patients did not show any injury, 20.5% had lesions grade 1, and grade 2 lesions 2.6%. As for the reproducibility of m-URS between hospitals, statistical analysis of the results showed differences between all the centers participating in the study. Conclusions: m-URS is an effective, safe, and reproducible technique that minimizes surgical aggression to the ureteral anatomy. Satisfactory and comparable results to “conventional” ureteroscopy were obtained in the treatment of distal ureteral stones in women, although clinical trials are needed. The reduction of the ureteral damage may reduce secondary procedures and increase the cost-effectiveness of the procedure.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/66094
ISSN: 2152-4920 (Print) | 2152-4939 (Online)
DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0503
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0503
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - SALUD - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Thumbnail2016_Caballero-Romeu_etal_JEndourology.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)3,14 MBAdobe PDFAbrir    Solicitar una copia
Thumbnail2016_Caballero-Romeu_etal_JEndourology_accepted.pdfAccepted Manuscript (acceso abierto)1,19 MBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.