Static and dynamic properties of retrofitted timber beams using glass fiber reinforced polymers

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/63147
Registro completo de metadatos
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributorGrupo de Ensayo, Simulación y Modelización de Estructuras (GRESMES)es_ES
dc.contributorDurabilidad de Materiales y Construcciones en Ingeniería y Arquitecturaes_ES
dc.contributorIngeniería del Terreno y sus Estructuras (InTerEs)es_ES
dc.contributor.authorBru, David-
dc.contributor.authorBaeza, F. Javier-
dc.contributor.authorVarona Moya, Francisco de Borja-
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Barba, Javier-
dc.contributor.authorIvorra, Salvador-
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Alicante. Departamento de Ingeniería Civiles_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-15T12:09:15Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-15T12:09:15Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-
dc.identifier.citationMaterials and Structures. 2016, 49(1): 181-191. doi:10.1617/s11527-014-0487-0es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1359-5997 (Print)-
dc.identifier.issn1871-6873 (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10045/63147-
dc.description.abstractA study on the static and dynamic properties of sawn timber beams reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) is reported in this paper. The experimental program is focused on the behavior of unidirectional wooden slabs, and the main objective is to fulfill the service state limit upon vibrations using GFRP when an architectonical retrofitting project is necessary. Two different typologies of reinforcement were evaluated on pine wood beams: one applied the composite only on the lower side of the beams, while the other also covered half of the beams depth. For the dynamic characterization, the natural frequency, damping ratio, and dynamic elastic modulus were measured using two different techniques: experimental modal analysis upon the whole beams; and bandwidth method using smaller samples of the same material. The static characterization consisted of four point bending tests, where elastic modulus, bending strength and ductility were assessed. The lower composite had better ductility and bending strength. On the other hand, the U-shaped laminate showed higher stiffness but also at a higher material cost. However, it allowed some ductility, i.e. compressive plasticity, even in the presence of hidden knots. Both dynamic techniques gave similar results and were capable of measuring the structure stiffness, even if short samples were used. Finally, the changes on dynamic properties because of the GFRP did not jeopardize the dynamic performance of the reinforced timber beams.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors want to acknowledge the University of Alicante for their economic support, Grant GRE12-04, Generalitat Valenciana Grant GV/2014/079 and the Spanish “Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad”, Grant BIA2012-34316.es_ES
dc.languageenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlandses_ES
dc.rights© RILEM 2014. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0487-0es_ES
dc.subjectTimber structureses_ES
dc.subjectGFRPes_ES
dc.subjectDynamic characterizationes_ES
dc.subjectDuctilityes_ES
dc.subject.otherMecánica de Medios Continuos y Teoría de Estructurases_ES
dc.subject.otherIngeniería de la Construcciónes_ES
dc.subject.otherIngeniería del Terrenoes_ES
dc.titleStatic and dynamic properties of retrofitted timber beams using glass fiber reinforced polymerses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.peerreviewedsies_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1617/s11527-014-0487-0-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0487-0es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//BIA2012-34316-
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - GRESMES - Artículos de Revistas
INV - DMCIA - Artículos de Revistas
INV - INTERES - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Thumbnail2016_Bru_etal_MaterialsandStructures_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)997,18 kBAdobe PDFAbrir    Solicitar una copia
Thumbnail2016_Bru_etal_MaterialsandStructures_preprint.pdfPreprint (acceso abierto)1,21 MBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.