A mixed-method synthesis of knowledge, experiences and attitudes of health professionals to Female Genital Mutilation

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/62268
Registro completo de metadatos
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributorEnfermería y Cultura de los Cuidados (EYCC)es_ES
dc.contributor.authorReig Alcaraz, María-
dc.contributor.authorSiles González, José-
dc.contributor.authorSolano-Ruiz, MCarmen-
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermeríaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-26T13:30:50Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-26T13:30:50Z-
dc.date.issued2016-02-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Advanced Nursing. 2016, 72(2): 245-260. doi:10.1111/jan.12823es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0309-2402 (Print)-
dc.identifier.issn1365-2648 (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10045/62268-
dc.description.abstractAim. To synthesize knowledge, attitudes and experiences of health professionals about Female Genital Mutilation. Background. Despite the World Health Organization campaigning to stop FGM, and it being illegal in many countries, the practice remains common in some countries and cultures. Migration has contributed to the growth of this practice in countries where it was not previously carried out. Design. Mixed-method synthesis. Data sources. Search of ten electronic databases: 2006–2014. Manual scanning of reference lists and summary feeds from international organizations such as WHO, UN and UNICEF. Review methods. Thematic synthesis comparing country of origin where the practice was common with country of residence where migrant women affected by the practice reside. 17 included descriptive, quantitative, qualitative studies and grey literature studies in English or Spanish. Results. Seven themes were developed: Ignorance of FGM practice and its consequences; Lack of adherence to FGM protocols and guidelines; Socially constructed acceptance of FGM; Ignorance of legislation and legal status of FGM; Condoning, sanctioning or supporting FGM; Lack of information and training; Nurses and Midwives as key to protecting and supporting girls and women. Conclusions. Although some nurses and midwives are in the forefront of eradicating FGM this is counterbalanced by health professionals (including nurses and midwives) who condone, sanction or support the practice with some calling for medicalization of FGM as a legitimate procedure. Girls at risk need better protection and women affected need more competent and cultural care from health professionals. Health and legal systems, professional regulation and governance, and professional training require strengthening to eradicate FGM, prevent the medicalization of FGM as an acceptable procedure, and to better manage the lifelong consequences for affected girls and women.es_ES
dc.languageenges_ES
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonses_ES
dc.rights© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltdes_ES
dc.subjectAttitudees_ES
dc.subjectCulturees_ES
dc.subjectFemale circumcisiones_ES
dc.subjectFemale genital mutilationes_ES
dc.subjectHealth personneles_ES
dc.subjectKnowledgees_ES
dc.subjectMidwiferyes_ES
dc.subjectMixed-method synthesises_ES
dc.subjectTranscultural nursinges_ES
dc.subject.otherEnfermeríaes_ES
dc.titleA mixed-method synthesis of knowledge, experiences and attitudes of health professionals to Female Genital Mutilationes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.peerreviewedsies_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jan.12823-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.12823es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - EYCC - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Thumbnail2016_Reig_etal_JAN_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)190,96 kBAdobe PDFAbrir    Solicitar una copia


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.