Defensive systems during the Men’s European University Beach Volleyball Championship
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/58508
Título: | Defensive systems during the Men’s European University Beach Volleyball Championship |
---|---|
Autor/es: | Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose Manuel | Pueo, Basilio | Penichet-Tomás, Alfonso |
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: | Grupo de Investigación en Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte (GICAFD) |
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Didáctica General y Didácticas Específicas |
Palabras clave: | Beach volley | Training | Beach sports | University sport | Block | Blockers |
Área/s de conocimiento: | Didáctica de la Expresión Corporal | Educación Física y Deportiva |
Fecha de publicación: | 26-sep-2016 |
Editor: | University of Piteşti, Romania |
Cita bibliográfica: | Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES). 2016, 16(3), Art 149: 945-950. doi:10.7752/jpes.2016.03149 |
Resumen: | The analysis of performance in beach volleyball should consider the development of the set or game systems in connection with successful completion. In this paper, we present a study of defensive system in university beach volleyball players in order to determine the evolution throughout the set and effectiveness in relation to the performance factors of the game. A total of n=937 blocking actions were analyzed by means of video recordings from 24 European men's teams from 16 different nationalities at the Ninth European Beach Volleyball Championship EUSA GAMES. The analysis of the videos was carried out using the free software program LongoMatch v.0.27 by an experienced observer. Reliability performed on the intra-observer analysis showed a margin of error lower than 5%. Both effectiveness of the game systems and frequency of winning and not winning points were annotated for each period of points. Statistical significance of the comparison of systems was calculated using the Z test to compare proportions. Results showed that the most widely used game system was 2:1 with 67.2% (n=630) with statistically significance (p<0.001). Regarding effectiveness, system 2:1 presented an efficiency of success of 30.8% (n=194), whereas system 1:2 presented a moderately low value of 25.7% (n=79). When comparing periods of points (F1:1 to 7, F2: 8 to 14, F3: 15 to 21), system 2:1 showed higher effectiveness than 1:2 for the last two periods F2 and F3. Finally, a decrease in unscored point actions was observed in both systems between periods F1 to F3 (59.63% for 1:2 and 45.35% for 2:1). |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/58508 |
ISSN: | 2247-8051 (Print) | 2247-806X (Online) |
DOI: | 10.7752/jpes.2016.03149 |
Idioma: | eng |
Tipo: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Derechos: | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 |
Revisión científica: | si |
Versión del editor: | http://dx.doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2016.03149 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | INV - GICAFD - Artículos de Revistas INV - HEALTH-TECH - Artículos de Revistas |
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016_Jimenez-Olmedo_etal_JPES.pdf | 177,72 kB | Adobe PDF | Abrir Vista previa | |
Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons