Clinical Validation of Adjusted Corneal Power in Patients with Previous Myopic Lasik Surgery

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/50245
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Clinical Validation of Adjusted Corneal Power in Patients with Previous Myopic Lasik Surgery
Autor/es: Camps, Vicente J. | Piñero, David P. | Mateo Pérez, Verónica | García Llopis, Celia | Artola, Alberto | Pérez Cambrodí, Rafael J. | Ruiz Fortes, Pedro
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Grupo de Óptica y Percepción Visual (GOPV) | Holografía y Procesado Óptico
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Óptica, Farmacología y Anatomía
Palabras clave: Corneal power | Clinical validation | Keratometric index | Laser refractive surgery
Área/s de conocimiento: Óptica
Fecha de publicación: 2015
Editor: Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Cita bibliográfica: Journal of Ophthalmology. Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 824293, 6 pages. doi:10.1155/2015/824293
Resumen: Purpose. To validate clinically a new method for estimating the corneal power (P,) using a variable keratometric index (nkadj) in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery. Setting. University of Alicante and Medimar International Hospital (Oftalmar), Alicante, (Spain). Design. Retrospective case series. Methods. This retrospective study comprised 62 eyes of 62 patients that had undergone myopic LASIK surgery. An algorithm for the calculation of 11kadj was used for the estimation of the adjusted keratometric corneal power (Pkadj). This value was compared with the classical keratometric corneal power (Pk), the True Net Power (TNP), and the Gaussian corneal power (PcGauss). Likewise, Pkadj was compared with other previously described methods. Results. Differences between PcGauss and P, values obtained with all methods evaluated were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Differences between Pkadj and PcGauss were in the limit of clinical significance (p < 0.01, loA [ - 0.33,0.60] D). Differences between Pkadj and TNP were not statistically and clinically significant (p = 0.319, loA [- 0.50,0.44] D). Differences between Pkadj and previously described methods were statistically significant (p < 0.01), except with PcHaigisL (p = 0.09, loA [ - 0.37,0.29] D). Conclusion. The use of the adjusted keratometric index (nkadj) is a valid method to estimate the central corneal power in corneas with previous myopic laser refractive surgery, providing results comparable to PcHaigisL.
Patrocinador/es: This study has been funded by the Project no. GRE12-33 of the University of Alicante.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/50245
ISSN: 2090-004X (Print) | 2090-0058 (Online)
DOI: 10.1155/2015/824293
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2015 Vicente J. Camps et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/824293
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - GHPO - Artículos de Revistas
INV - GOPV - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Thumbnail2015_Camps_etal_Journal-of-Ophthalmology.pdf1,19 MBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons