Criterion-related validity of toe-touch test for estimating hamstring extensibility: A meta-analysis

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/39588
Registro completo de metadatos
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorMayorga Vega, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorViciana, Jesús-
dc.contributor.authorCocca, Armando-
dc.contributor.authorMerino Marban, Rafael-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-28T11:46:25Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-28T11:46:25Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2014, 9(1): 188-200. doi:10.4100/jhse.2014.91.18es
dc.identifier.issn1988-5202-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10045/39588-
dc.description.abstractThe main purpose of the present meta-analysis was to examine the scientific literature on the criterion-related validity of the toe-touch test for estimating hamstring extensibility. For this purpose relevant studies were searched from five electronic databases dated up through September 2012. Primary outcomes of criterion-related validity were Pearson´s zero-order correlation coefficients (r) between the toe-touch test and hamstring extensibility criterion measure. Then, from the included studies, the Hunter-Schmidt´s psychometric meta-analysis approach was conducted to estimate population criterion-related validity of the toe-touch test. Firstly, the corrected correlation mean (rp), unaffected by sampling error and measurement error, was calculated. Subsequently, the three potential moderator variables (sex of participants, age of participants, and level of hamstring extensibility) were examined by a partially hierarchical analysis. Of the six studies included in the present meta-analysis, 12 correlations values were retrieved. The overall results showed that the toe-touch test have a moderate mean criterion-related validity for estimating hamstring extensibility (rp = 0.66, 0.54-0.79). Generally, females, children and individuals with high levels of hamstring extensibility seem to have greater mean values of criterion-related validity for estimating hamstring extensibility. However, due to the low number of r values found, the fact that almost all the 95% CIs of mean correlation coefficients were overlapped, and that criterion-related validity of the toe-touch test within each category was still heterogeneous, we should be cautious with the results of the present meta-analysis. When the use of the angular tests is limited, the toe-touch test seems to be a useful alternative to estimate hamstring extensibility.es
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author Daniel Mayorga-Vega is supported by a research grant from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport (AP2010-5905).es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherUniversidad de Alicante. Área de Educación Física y Deportees
dc.rightsLicencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0es
dc.subjectConcurrent validityes
dc.subjectRange of motiones
dc.subjectFlexibilityes
dc.subjectStand and reach testes
dc.subjectLineal testes
dc.subjectField-based physical fitness testes
dc.subjectResearch synthesises
dc.subjectSystematic reviewes
dc.subject.otherEducación Física y Deportivaes
dc.titleCriterion-related validity of toe-touch test for estimating hamstring extensibility: A meta-analysises
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.peerreviewedsies
dc.identifier.doi10.4100/jhse.2014.91.18-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2014.91.18es
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
Aparece en las colecciones:Journal of Human Sport and Exercise - 2014, Vol. 9, No. 1

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Thumbnailjhse_Vol_9_N_I_188-200.pdf359,82 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons