Acceptability of pandemic A(H1N1) influenza vaccination by Essential Community Workers in 2010 Alicante (Spain), perceived seriousness and sources of information
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/39008
Título: | Acceptability of pandemic A(H1N1) influenza vaccination by Essential Community Workers in 2010 Alicante (Spain), perceived seriousness and sources of information |
---|---|
Autor/es: | Caballero, Pablo | Tuells, José | Duro Torrijos, José Luis | Nolasco, Andreu |
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: | Grupo Balmis de Investigación en Salud Comunitaria e Historia de la Ciencia |
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia |
Palabras clave: | Vaccine | Influenza A(H1N1) | Health behavior | Information sources |
Área/s de conocimiento: | Enfermería |
Fecha de publicación: | nov-2013 |
Editor: | Elsevier |
Cita bibliográfica: | Preventive Medicine. 2013, 57(5): 725-728. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.08.008 |
Resumen: | Objective. Describe acceptability of pandemic A(H1N1) influenza vaccination by Essential Community Workers (ECWs) from Alicante province (Spain) in January 2010. Evaluate the correlation with attitudes, beliefs, professional advice and information broadcasted by media. Method. In this cross-sectional study, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 742 ECWs to assess their attitudes towards vaccination against the pandemic influenza strain. A multivariable regression model was made to adjust the Odds Ratios (ORs). Results. Some ECWs reported having been vaccinated with seasonal vaccine, 21.5% (95%IC 18.6–24.9); only 15.4% (95%IC 12.8–18.4) with the pandemic one. ECWs vaccinated regularly against seasonal flu (OR 5.1; 95%IC 2.9–9.1), those who considered pandemic influenza as a severe or more serious disease than seasonal flu (OR 3.8; 95%IC 2.1–6.7) and those who never had doubts about vaccine safety (OR 3.7; 95%IC2.1–6.7) had a better acceptance of pandemic vaccine. Finally, 78.7% (95%IC 75.1–81.4) had doubts about pandemic vaccine's effectiveness. Conclusion. The vast amount of information provided by the media did not seem to be decisive to prevent doubts or to improve the acceptability of the vaccine in ECWs. Professional advice should be the focus of interest in future influenza vaccination campaigns. These results should be taken into account by health authorities. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/39008 |
ISSN: | 0091-7435 (Print) | 1096-0260 (Online) |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.08.008 |
Idioma: | eng |
Tipo: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Revisión científica: | si |
Versión del editor: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.08.008 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | INV - SALUD - Artículos de Revistas Cátedra Balmis de Vacunología - Publicaciones |
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2013_Caballero_etal_PM_final.pdf | Versión final (acceso restringido) | 138,8 kB | Adobe PDF | Abrir Solicitar una copia |
Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.