The provision of water and shade but not soil amendments in degraded habitats increases the seedling survival of woody species in restoration processes of the Chilean sclerophyllous forest

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/141508
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: The provision of water and shade but not soil amendments in degraded habitats increases the seedling survival of woody species in restoration processes of the Chilean sclerophyllous forest
Autor/es: Becerra, Pablo I. | Arellano, Eduardo C. | Vilagrosa, Alberto | Hernández, Gabriel | Figueroa, César
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Gestión de Ecosistemas y de la Biodiversidad (GEB)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Ecología | CEAM (Centro Estudios Ambientales del Mediterráneo)
Palabras clave: Irrigation | Mediterranean-type climate | Reforestation | Restoration | Shading | Soil amendments
Fecha de publicación: 13-mar-2024
Editor: Springer Nature
Cita bibliográfica: Trees. 2024, 38: 523-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-024-02500-1
Resumen: Key message Using artificial shading in reforested seedlings is recommended for different species, irrigation levels and soil treatments in semiarid ecosystems, but the application of pork sludge and horse guano are ineffective. Abstract Application of irrigation, artificial shade and soil amendments can increase the survival of seedlings in plant restoration processes of semiarid ecosystems, however, the effects of shade and soil amendment could occur only without or with low levels of irrigation. In this study, we tested these hypotheses in four woody species (Quillaja saponaria, Lithrea caustica, Schinus polygamus, and Colliguaja odorifera) from the Mediterranean-type climate region of Chile. By mean a factorial experiment, we evaluated different irrigation frequencies (1 L/week and 1 L/2 weeks during the five driest months, no irrigation), artificial shade types (polypropylene shelter, black mesh, deep hole, and no shade) and soil amendment types (natural soil, pork sludge, and horse guano). In 2014, a total of 720 plants per species were planted at each of two sites located in a pre-Andean and a coastal area, and monitored until September 2016. The effect of the type of artificial shade did not depend on the level of irrigation. All shade treatments produced positive effects on the survival of all the species, but the mesh and polypropylene shelter had a greater positive impact than planting in a deep hole. Irrigation treatments increased the survival of all species, although the effect of the highest frequency depended on the site and species. The soil amendment treatments did not have significant positive effects under any condition. In conclusion, the use of artificial shading may be recommended for different species, sites, irrigation and soil treatments in semiarid ecosystems, although the type of shade may depend on the species.
Patrocinador/es: The study was financed by the projects 007/2013 FIBN-CONAF, ANID PIA/BASAL FB0002 and ANID BASAL FB210015. AV thanks to MICIN (INERTIA, PID2019-111332RB-C22) and Prometeo program (EVER Prometeo CIPROM/2022/37) for funding suport. CEAM is funded by Generalitat Valenciana.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/141508
ISSN: 0931-1890 (Print) | 1432-2285 (Online)
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-024-02500-1
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-024-02500-1
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - GEB - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailBecerra_etal_2024_Trees_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)1,2 MBAdobe PDFAbrir    Solicitar una copia


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.