Can the craniocervical position modulate trunk muscle activation during a deadlift? A preliminary electromyographical analysis comparing conventional and sumo variations

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/130072
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Can the craniocervical position modulate trunk muscle activation during a deadlift? A preliminary electromyographical analysis comparing conventional and sumo variations
Autor/es: García-Jaén, Miguel | Sanchis-Soler, Gema | Casanova-Juliá, Marc | Sebastiá-Amat, Sergio | Cortell-Tormo, Juan M.
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Health, Physical Activity, and Sports Technology (HEALTH-TECH) | Grupo de Investigación en Alimentación y Nutrición (ALINUT)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Didáctica General y Didácticas Específicas
Palabras clave: Strength training | Back musculature | Core | EMG | Powerlifting
Fecha de publicación: 30-nov-2022
Editor: University of Piteşti, Romania
Cita bibliográfica: Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES). 2022, 22(11), Art 332: 2904-2912. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2022.11367
Resumen: To prevent back pain and injuries, it is essential to select appropriate strength training exercises and to ensure their correct technical execution. The deadlift exercise and its variations seem to be highly effective at activating the posterior body kinetic chain. This exercise is therefore recommended, when is properly performed, for injury and back pain prevention in both athletes and inactive people. Therefore, a more comprehensive understanding of the deadlift exercise is still necessary. The aim of this study was to compare trunk muscle activity in conventional and sumo deadlift variations performed in various craniocervical positions. Similar submaximal loads were used across all experimental conditions. Three participants with strength training experience (age: 21.67±1.15 years, height: 169±10 cm, body mass: 75.13 ± 7.00 kg and body fat percentage: 9.87±2.49 %) performed the conventional and sumo deadlift variations in different craniocervical positions: neutral, extension and flexion. Participants followed a familiarization session applying the same submaximal load, number of repetitions, lifting velocity and exercise variations than in the posterior testing session. Trunk muscle activation was quantified via surface electromyography (EMG). Participants presented greater latissimus dorsi activation in the neutral condition, and this activation level was higher during the conventional deadlift variation. The greatest EMG response was found in the erector spinae muscles in the extension position, especially in the conventional variation. Finally, the greatest trapezium musculature activation was found in the flexion condition. During the sumo performance, the highest trapezium activity was detected in the middle trapezium fibers whereas during the conventional performance, the highest value was recorded in the superior trapezium fibers. Deadlift variations and craniocervical positions thus did trigger different levels of myoelectric activation in the analyzed musculature, showing how the craniocervical position influences the activity of posterior trunk musculature.
Patrocinador/es: This research was funded by Consellería de Educación, Investigación, Cultura y Deporte de la Generalitat Valenciana, and the European Social Fund (European Union), research project number ACIF/2016/048.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/130072
ISSN: 2247-8051 (Print) | 2247-806X (Online)
DOI: 10.7752/jpes.2022.11367
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2022.11367
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - ALINUT - Artículos de Revistas
INV - HEALTH-TECH - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailGarcia-Jaen_etal_2022_JPES.pdf263,83 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons