Is multidimensional precarious employment higher for women?

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/128703
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Is multidimensional precarious employment higher for women?
Autor/es: Murillo Huertas, Inés P. | Ramos Lobo, Raúl | Simón, Hipólito | Simón-Albert, Raquel
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Territorio y Movilidad. Mercados de Trabajo y Vivienda
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Análisis Económico Aplicado | Universidad de Alicante. Instituto Interuniversitario de Economía Internacional
Palabras clave: Gender gap | Employment precariousness | Quality of employment | Multidimensional indices
Fecha de publicación: 12-oct-2022
Editor: SAGE Publications
Cita bibliográfica: Journal of Industrial Relations. 2023, 65(1): 44-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856221128873
Resumen: This article examines the relative employment situation of female employees from a novel perspective based on the construction of multidimensional indicators of employment precariousness that allow examining its scale and nature. The evidence obtained for Spain shows that both the intensity and incidence of precarious employment are significantly higher for women, to the point that half of the women are multidimensionally precarious (with an incidence which is 40% higher than that of men) and precarious females simultaneously suffer on average from nearly three deficiencies in their jobs. Although female employment precariousness is highly persistent over time, it also exhibits significant oscillations plausibly linked to changes in the economy's cyclical position and in labour market regulations. Moreover, it exhibits a great heterogeneity by subgroups (it has even an extreme nature for certain subgroups of females) and by individuals (25% of women suffer between three and six job deficiencies, which compares with 24% of women having jobs without any type of deficiency). Finally, although the greater labour precariousness of women is largely explained by their observed characteristics, particularly by their greater presence in part-time jobs, women still have a greater probability of being precarious than observationally similar men.
Patrocinador/es: This work was supported by the Department of Innovation, Universities, Science and Digital Society of the Comunidad Valenciana, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, (grant number AICO/2021/062, PID2020-114896RB-I00) and by the Ministry of Science and Innovation (project number PID2020-118355RB-I00).
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/128703
ISSN: 0022-1856 (Print) | 1472-9296 (Online)
DOI: 10.1177/00221856221128873
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © Australian Labour and Employment Relations Association (ALERA) 2022 SAGE Publications Ltd, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore and Washington DC.
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856221128873
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - TEYMO - Artículos de Revistas / Journal Articles

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailMurillo-Huertas_etal_2023_JIndustrRelat_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)974,7 kBAdobe PDFAbrir    Solicitar una copia
ThumbnailMurillo-Huertas_etal_2023_JIndustrRelat_preprint.pdfPreprint (acceso abierto)673,04 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.