Is multidimensional precarious employment higher for women?
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/128703
Título: | Is multidimensional precarious employment higher for women? |
---|---|
Autor/es: | Murillo Huertas, Inés P. | Ramos Lobo, Raúl | Simón, Hipólito | Simón-Albert, Raquel |
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: | Territorio y Movilidad. Mercados de Trabajo y Vivienda |
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Análisis Económico Aplicado | Universidad de Alicante. Instituto Interuniversitario de Economía Internacional |
Palabras clave: | Gender gap | Employment precariousness | Quality of employment | Multidimensional indices |
Fecha de publicación: | 12-oct-2022 |
Editor: | SAGE Publications |
Cita bibliográfica: | Journal of Industrial Relations. 2023, 65(1): 44-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856221128873 |
Resumen: | This article examines the relative employment situation of female employees from a novel perspective based on the construction of multidimensional indicators of employment precariousness that allow examining its scale and nature. The evidence obtained for Spain shows that both the intensity and incidence of precarious employment are significantly higher for women, to the point that half of the women are multidimensionally precarious (with an incidence which is 40% higher than that of men) and precarious females simultaneously suffer on average from nearly three deficiencies in their jobs. Although female employment precariousness is highly persistent over time, it also exhibits significant oscillations plausibly linked to changes in the economy's cyclical position and in labour market regulations. Moreover, it exhibits a great heterogeneity by subgroups (it has even an extreme nature for certain subgroups of females) and by individuals (25% of women suffer between three and six job deficiencies, which compares with 24% of women having jobs without any type of deficiency). Finally, although the greater labour precariousness of women is largely explained by their observed characteristics, particularly by their greater presence in part-time jobs, women still have a greater probability of being precarious than observationally similar men. |
Patrocinador/es: | This work was supported by the Department of Innovation, Universities, Science and Digital Society of the Comunidad Valenciana, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, (grant number AICO/2021/062, PID2020-114896RB-I00) and by the Ministry of Science and Innovation (project number PID2020-118355RB-I00). |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/128703 |
ISSN: | 0022-1856 (Print) | 1472-9296 (Online) |
DOI: | 10.1177/00221856221128873 |
Idioma: | eng |
Tipo: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Derechos: | © Australian Labour and Employment Relations Association (ALERA) 2022 SAGE Publications Ltd, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore and Washington DC. |
Revisión científica: | si |
Versión del editor: | https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856221128873 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | INV - TEYMO - Artículos de Revistas / Journal Articles |
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Murillo-Huertas_etal_2023_JIndustrRelat_final.pdf | Versión final (acceso restringido) | 974,7 kB | Adobe PDF | Abrir Solicitar una copia |
Murillo-Huertas_etal_2023_JIndustrRelat_preprint.pdf | Preprint (acceso abierto) | 673,04 kB | Adobe PDF | Abrir Vista previa |
Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.