Effect of conservative treatment of pelvic floor dysfunctions in women: an umbrella review

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/122060
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Effect of conservative treatment of pelvic floor dysfunctions in women: an umbrella review
Autor/es: Bascur-Castillo, Carolina | Carrasco Portiño, Mercedes | Valenzuela Peters, Romina | Orellana-Gaete, Luna | Viveros-Allende, Vicente | Ruiz-Cantero, María Teresa
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Salud Pública
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia
Palabras clave: Pelvic floor | Pelvic floor disorder | Conservative treatment | Urinary incontinence | Exercise | Pelvic floor muscle training
Área/s de conocimiento: Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública
Fecha de publicación: 4-mar-2022
Editor: Wiley
Cita bibliográfica: International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2022, 159(2): 372-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14172
Resumen: Background: Due to their high worldwide prevalence, pelvic floor dysfunctions (PFD´s) are a public health problem. There is high heterogeneity in the types and effectiveness of conservative treatment. Objective: To analyze the scientific evidence on conservative treatment of PFDs in women. Search strategy: Umbrella review, covering MEDLINE (1950-2019), Scopus (1960-2019), Web of Science (1980-2019), and Cochrane Library (2000-2019). Selection criteria: Inclusion criterion: review on conservative treatments about pelvic floor disorders in the adult women, in Spanish or English; Exclusion criterion: studies about other urological, gynecological, and coloproctological pathologies, among others. Results: 32 reviews (2000 to 2019), 12 meta-analysis. 53.1% showed an improvement on urinary incontinence. Pelvic floor muscle training worked on 70.6% of them, followed by electrical stimulation and estrogen (11.7%), and weight loss (5.9%). 6.3% of reviews and meta-analyses fulfilled all items in PRISMA, and 93.7% of them fulfilled more than 60% of the checklist. 60% de los ítems. Conclusions: PFMT and weight loss are the most effective treatments for UI, but there is no evidence for other PFDs. The methodological quality of conservative treatments must be improved for a more effective treatment of PFDs in women.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/122060
ISSN: 0020-7292 (Print) | 1879-3479 (Online)
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14172
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2022 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14172
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - SP - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailBascur‐Castillo_etal_2022_IntJGynecologyObstetrics_accepted.pdfAccepted Manuscript (acceso abierto)1,41 MBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa
ThumbnailBascur‐Castillo_etal_2022_IntJGynecologyObstetrics_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)1,6 MBAdobe PDFAbrir    Solicitar una copia


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.