Validation of Digital Applications for Evaluation of Visual Parameters: A Narrative Review

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/119670
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Title: Validation of Digital Applications for Evaluation of Visual Parameters: A Narrative Review
Authors: Mena-Guevara, Kevin J. | Piñero, David P. | Fez Saiz, Dolores de
Research Group/s: Grupo de Óptica y Percepción Visual (GOPV)
Center, Department or Service: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Óptica, Farmacología y Anatomía
Keywords: Visual function | App | Electronic device | Visual acuity | Tablet | Contrast sensitivity
Knowledge Area: Óptica
Issue Date: 24-Nov-2021
Publisher: MDPI
Citation: Mena-Guevara KJ, Piñero DP, de Fez D. Validation of Digital Applications for Evaluation of Visual Parameters: A Narrative Review. Vision. 2021; 5(4):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision5040058
Abstract: The current review aimed to collect and critically analyze the scientific peer-reviewed literature that is available about the use of digital applications for evaluation of visual parameters in electronic devices (tablets and smartphones), confirming if there are studies calibrating and validating each of these applications. Three bibliographic search engines (using the search equation described in the paper) and the Mendeley reference manager search engine were used to complete the analysis. Only articles written in English and that are evaluating the use of tests in healthy patients to measure or characterize any visual function aspects using tablets or smartphones were included. Articles using electronic visual tests to assess the results of surgical procedures or are conducted in pathological conditions were excluded. A total of 19 articles meeting these inclusion and exclusion criteria were finally analyzed. One critical point of all these studies is that there was no mention of the characterization (spatial and/or colorimetrical) of screens and the stimuli used in most of them. Only two studies described some level of calibration of the digital device before the beginning of the study. Most revised articles described non-controlled comparatives studies (73.7%), reporting some level of scientific evidence on the validation of tools, although more consistent studies are needed.
Sponsor: The author David P. Piñero has been supported by the Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness of Spain within the program Ramón y Cajal, RYC-2016-20471.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/119670
ISSN: 2411-5150
DOI: 10.3390/vision5040058
Language: eng
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Peer Review: si
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.3390/vision5040058
Appears in Collections:INV - GOPV - Artículos de Revistas

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ThumbnailMena-Guevara_etal_2021_Vision.pdf600,55 kBAdobe PDFOpen Preview


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons