Barriers to ecological restoration in Europe: expert perspectives

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/113679
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Barriers to ecological restoration in Europe: expert perspectives
Autor/es: Cortina, Jordi | García‐Sánchez, Ismael | Grace, Miriam | Andrés, Pilar | Baker, Susan | Bullock, Craig | Decleer, Kris | Dicks, Lynn V. | Fisher, Judith L. | Frouz, Jan | Klimkowska, Agata | Kyriazopoulos, Apostolos P. | Moreno‐Mateos, David | Rodríguez‐González, Patricia M. | Sarkki, Simo | Ventocilla, Jorge L.
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Gestión de Ecosistemas y de la Biodiversidad (GEB)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Ecología | Universidad de Alicante. Instituto Multidisciplinar para el Estudio del Medio "Ramón Margalef"
Palabras clave: European Union Nature Directives | Delphi process | Political priorities | Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 | Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 | EU Restoration Plan
Área/s de conocimiento: Ecología
Fecha de publicación: 12-ene-2021
Editor: Wiley
Cita bibliográfica: Restoration Ecology. 2021, 29(4): e13346. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13346
Resumen: Ecological restoration is key to counteracting anthropogenic degradation of biodiversity and to reducing disaster risk. However, there is limited knowledge of barriers hindering the wider implementation of restoration practices, despite high level political priority to halt the loss of biodiversity. In Europe, progress on ecological restoration has been slow and insufficient to meet international agreements and comply with European Union Nature Directives. We assessed European restoration experts' perceptions on barriers to restoration in Europe, and their relative importance, through a multiple expert consultation using a Delphi process. We found that experts share a common multi‐dimensional concept of ecological restoration. Experts identified a large number of barriers (33) to the advancement of ecological restoration in Europe. Major barriers pertained to the socio‐economic, not the environmental, domain. The three most important being insufficient funding, conflicting interests among different stakeholders and low political priority given to restoration. Our results emphasize the need to increase political commitment at all levels, comply with existing nature laws, and optimize the use of financial resources by increasing funds for ecological restoration and eradicate environmentally harmful subsidies. The experts also call for the integration of ecological restoration into land‐use planning and facilitating stakeholders' collaboration. Our study identifies key barriers, discusses ways to overcome the main barriers to ER in Europe, and contributes knowledge to support the implementation of the European Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, and the EU 2030 Restoration Plan in particular.
Patrocinador/es: We appreciate the support given by BiodivERsA (project funded under the EU Horizon 2020 ERA-NET COFUND scheme), and the EKLIPSE project (European Union Horizon 2020 grant agreement 690474), and particularly by Juliette C. Young. JCS research is financially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Education and Universities and European Regional Development Funds (FEDER; project COSTERA, RTI2018-095954-B-I00). PMRG research is funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through FCT Investigator Program grant number IF/00059/2015, and Centro de Estudos Florestais is supported by FCT grants UID/AGR/00239/2019 and UIDB/00239/2020.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/113679
ISSN: 1061-2971 (Print) | 1526-100X (Online)
DOI: 10.1111/rec.13346
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2021 The Authors. Restoration Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13346
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - GEB - Artículos de Revistas
Investigaciones financiadas por la UE

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailCortina-Segarra_etal_2021_RestEcol.pdf1,52 MBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.