Adaptation and Validation of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form in Spanish Subjects

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/108657
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Title: Adaptation and Validation of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form in Spanish Subjects
Authors: Martinez-Gonzalez, Dolores | Dòria, Montse | Martínez-Alonso, Montserrat | Alcubierre, Nuria | Valls, Joan | Verdú, José | Granado-Casas, Minerva | Mauricio, Didac
Research Group/s: Grupo Balmis de Investigación en Salud Comunitaria e Historia de la Ciencia
Center, Department or Service: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia
Keywords: Diabetic foot ulcer | Type 2 diabetes | Quality of life | Psychometric validation | Reliability | Validity
Knowledge Area: Enfermería
Issue Date: 3-Aug-2020
Publisher: MDPI
Citation: Martinez-Gonzalez D, Dòria M, Martínez-Alonso M, Alcubierre N, Valls J, Verdú-Soriano J, Granado-Casas M, Mauricio D. Adaptation and Validation of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form in Spanish Subjects. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(8):2497. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082497
Abstract: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a chronic complication that negatively affects the quality of life (QoL) of diabetic patients. In Spain, there is no specifically designed and validated instrument to assess the QoL of patients with DFU. Our aim was to adapt the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form (DFS-SF) questionnaire to a Spanish population and validate it. A prospective, observational design was used. The DFS-SF was administered by personal interview. The validated SF-36 and EQ-5D generic instruments were used as reference tools. The reliability, validity, and sensitivity to changes were assessed using standard statistical methods. A sample of 141 patients with DFU was recruited. The content validity was 3.46 on average (maximum score of 4). The internal consistency of the DFS-SF subscales showed a standardized Cronbach’s α range between 0.720 and 0.948. The DFS-SF domains showed excellent reproducibility measures (intraclass correlation coefficient from 0.77–0.92). The criterion validity was good with significant correlations between each DFS-SF subscale and its corresponding SF-36 and EQ-5D subscales (p < 0.001). However, the questionnaire structure was not validated (comparative fit index = 0.844, root mean square error of approximation = 0.095, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.093). The instrument showed high sensitivity to ulcer changes over time (p < 0.001). The adapted and validated Spanish version of the DFS-SF questionnaire has good psychometric properties and shows good sensitivity to ulcer changes, although the construct validity was not optimal. The adapted questionnaire will be a useful tool specifically to assess the QoL in subjects with diabetic foot ulcers in the clinical and research settings in Spain.
Sponsor: CIBERDEM is an initiative from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Plan Nacional de I + D + I and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional). M.G.-C. held a predoctoral fellowship from the Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, FPU15/03005. This project was developed in the context of the Programme “Doctorat en Medicina de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona”, Autonomous University of Barcelona.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/108657
ISSN: 2077-0383
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082497
Language: eng
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights: © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Peer Review: si
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082497
Appears in Collections:INV - WINTER HERIDAS - Artículos de Revistas
INV - SALUD - Artículos de Revistas

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ThumbnailMartinez-Gonzalez_etal_2020_JClinMed.pdf908,8 kBAdobe PDFOpen Preview


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons